Archelle Georgiou thinks so. Her very well-written post (on her own blog here and on Managed Care magazine here) is a thoughtful obituary. She puts the time of death last November, when the New England Journal published Nancy McCall and Jerry Cromwell's report on the CMS disease management pilot program (N Engl J Med 2011; 365:1704-1712). The various DM programs showed little or no benefit, but they cost CMS $400 million. Yes, I agree: disease management, as we know it, has bought the farm and ought to be buried.
Dr. Georgiou offers several quite cogent reasons for DM's failure. The most compelling is that DM as implemented has drifted from the format and target audience originally proven effective in clinical trials in the 1990's. Again, I think she is spot on.
What should we do to improve outcomes and reduce costs going forward? Many of the ideas being proposed appear promising, but have less of a justification than the currently-employed versions of DM have. We just wasted billions of dollars and many years by failing to use the evidence base correctly. It doesn't seem wise to me to abandon the requirement for solid evidence before we invest again. Rather, we should take steps to ensure that we use technologies and programs that are evidence-based AND that we employ them as close to tested as possible.
What are those technologies and programs? Classic disease management for heart failure patients has been proven effective many times and should be retained. Use of automatic systems to support chronic disease patients (and their providers) are very low cost and have also been proven in large randomized studies. Lowering co-pays and barriers to access for essential medications and services is another strategy with a large evidence base.
Let's not throw out the evidence-based baby with the DM bathwater.
A personal look at clinical decision support -- using individual information (lab test results, clinical findings, prescriptions, administrative data, etc.) to engage patients, improve individual care, enhance population health, and make health care safer, faster, cheaper and more effective.
Monday, January 16, 2012
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
The psychology of exchanging health information with patients
How does exchanging health information work to improve health? Getting the facts about your favorite subject (you!) is extraordinarily motivating. It is the reason why actionable communications like those embedded in effective patient outreach systems work. Here's a nice review of the psychology by Joe Kvedar at Connected Health: Self-Quantification as a Driver of Behavior Change
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
QR Codes for communicating with patients...
QR Codes are those funny little black and white squares that look like a checkerboard with a screw loose. They can contain a surprising amount of information. For instance, here is the URL for this blog:

If you scan this code with you phone, you will be directed ..... right back here. You can also do text. This one contains some words of wisdom from Mark Twain:

QR Codes are starting to be used in marketing (I've seen them on posters and flyers), but now that smart phones are so ubiquitous, they provide an option for sharing information with patients (an others). If you turn their medication list into a QR Code, they can scan it right into their smart phone and have it handy whenever. Here is a 6-minute video from the folks at Skyline Family Practice, in Front Royal, Virginia with some examples:

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSBIXSk4nbg for the non-scanning crowd)
Have fun scanning!
If you scan this code with you phone, you will be directed ..... right back here. You can also do text. This one contains some words of wisdom from Mark Twain:
QR Codes are starting to be used in marketing (I've seen them on posters and flyers), but now that smart phones are so ubiquitous, they provide an option for sharing information with patients (an others). If you turn their medication list into a QR Code, they can scan it right into their smart phone and have it handy whenever. Here is a 6-minute video from the folks at Skyline Family Practice, in Front Royal, Virginia with some examples:
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSBIXSk4nbg for the non-scanning crowd)
Have fun scanning!
Friday, September 16, 2011
National Medical Home Summit
| |||||||||||||||
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Webinar: Advanced IT for the Medical Home: Engaging the Patient
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Saturday, September 10, 2011
Exchanging Health Information to improve medication adherence
Getting the right medicine into the right patient at the right time is a particularly challenging problem in outpatient care. Consider the required steps:
- Prescriber selects the right medication
- Prescriber prescribes the right medication
- Patient carries the paper prescription to the pharmacy
- Pharmacist interprets the written prescription correctly
- Pharmacist selects, packages and labels the medication correctly
- Patient returns to pharmacy
- Patient receives the correct package
- Patient takes the medication as prescribed
- Patient requests refill at appropriate time
- Return to Step 5
There have been a number of studies on "secondary non-adherence" in which the pharmacy records identify patients who don't get refills (Step #9). There have even been some analyses of patients who drop off their paper prescription but fail to pick up the medicines (Step #6). However, until recently, the gap between prescribing and dispensing the first unit (Steps #3, "Primary Non-adherence") has been very difficult to study because of the lack of information exchange between the prescriber and the dispenser.
Marsha A. Raebel and the good folks at the Kaiser Permanente Institute for Health Research in Colorado just published an article in The Journal of General Internal Medicine about using health technology to identify those patients who need help in getting their first fill. They looked at over 12,000 new electronic prescriptions for blood pressure, cholesterol or diabetes. Overall, about 7% failed to pick up their first medication, even though these patients had pretty good insurance coverage.
It is not clear yet why these folks don't show up to pick up their pills. Nor is it clear exactly what should be done about it. However, it is clear that this kind of health information exchange between prescribers and pharmacists should trigger an alert to someone inside the system: "This patient is not getting the intended care - call them and find out why!!"
Marsha A. Raebel, Jennifer L. Ellis, Nikki M. Carroll, Elizabeth A. Bayliss and Brandy McGinnis, et al.
Journal of General Internal Medicine Online First™, 30 August 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)